Post by nijhumnishita033 on Jan 11, 2024 0:19:07 GMT -8
After the trial judge fully upheld the claim, declared the nullity of two mortgage clauses and ordered the bank to pay costs, the Provincial Court of Salamanca has corrected the Court on this last point, understanding that the consumer used the procedure with the sole or main purpose of obtaining an order for costs . In the opinion of the Court, “it cannot be tolerated that the process becomes an end in itself.” We put in context In September 2020, the Court of First Instance No. 9 of Salamanca fully upheld the claim and declared the nullity of two mortgage clauses (expenses and late payment interest) of a loan signed in December 1997 with BBVA, already canceled by amortization, with express condemnation of costs to the defendant .
In this way, the plaintiff reiterates her initial claim for compensation regarding the claim for the amount of money invested in the game and bets in the amount of 17,994 euros and another 13,495.50 euros as moral Phone Number Data damage. Second instance: full confirmation of the ruling Now, in its ruling of November 4, 2021, the Murcia AP dismisses both the appeal and the challenge made and fully confirms the ruling handed down by the Court of First Instance. The Chamber disagrees with the fact that the appellant has complied with its regulatory obligations imposed on access control.
In particular, the Court recalls that its responsibility "is not reduced only to the material provision of said control service in the terms it mentions, but to the effective compliance and correct execution thereof by the people in charge of said control." Palace of Justice of the Region of Murcia. (Photo: Nacho García/AGM) In the present case, the extract from the actor's current account or the extract from the RETA card are sufficient means of proof to prove that the young gambling addict accessed, without any impediment , those “reserved places or areas” and the performance of bet on the special gaming machines there.
In this way, the plaintiff reiterates her initial claim for compensation regarding the claim for the amount of money invested in the game and bets in the amount of 17,994 euros and another 13,495.50 euros as moral Phone Number Data damage. Second instance: full confirmation of the ruling Now, in its ruling of November 4, 2021, the Murcia AP dismisses both the appeal and the challenge made and fully confirms the ruling handed down by the Court of First Instance. The Chamber disagrees with the fact that the appellant has complied with its regulatory obligations imposed on access control.
In particular, the Court recalls that its responsibility "is not reduced only to the material provision of said control service in the terms it mentions, but to the effective compliance and correct execution thereof by the people in charge of said control." Palace of Justice of the Region of Murcia. (Photo: Nacho García/AGM) In the present case, the extract from the actor's current account or the extract from the RETA card are sufficient means of proof to prove that the young gambling addict accessed, without any impediment , those “reserved places or areas” and the performance of bet on the special gaming machines there.